All project leaders wish
to delete the word ‘delay’. It affects project cost, worker morale, quality of
completed project and industry reputation. If delay arises due to Environmental
ministry, it scares them the most. Recently Prakash Javadeker, Minister of Environment
& Forests said that the word ‘delay’ is deleted by his ministry by speeding
up the approval process in the past three months. But this has been seen as an
assault on the greens from nature conservationists. On a positive side it’s a
dream come true for project leaders of national highways, hydropower, mining,
irrigation, oil & gas, railways, power, defense, and manufacturing sector. Is
delete button becoming synonymous with ‘Minimum
Governance’?.
But, on 25th
August 2014, Supreme Court has given the first jolt to the NDA government for
altering the composition of National Board of Wildlife (NBW) and its standing
Committee. An open published letter is addressed to the Prime Minister by NBW
on 12th Sep 2014. It acts as a reminder for him to make good of his own
message - “Zero defect and zero effect”.
Letter literally opens up the Pandora box of its own non-compliance: (1) number
of current board member present (11) versus needed (47); (2) bypassing of
Section 5(A) norms of Wildlife Protection Act (WPA).(3) In two sessions, 133
development projects were cleared and pronounced environmental friendly cleared
out of 160 assessed. Was that a sign of superman project leader or the
avoidance of fear of complexity involved in evaluating the projects.?
It’s an excellent Project
leader skill to remove bottlenecks. But shortage of ecology experts in the EC
panel should not be used as a safety buffer in front of bottleneck. Bottleneck
is generally removed by putting more resources, leaning, standardizing, fool
proofing, flexible resourcing, or job levelling etc. Whichever approach thy use,
even then the required number of resources - ecology experts - is needed for evaluation,
acceptance / rejection.
An insight from an
operation management perspective warns of common misunderstanding between ‘removing of bottleneck’ and ‘changing of bottleneck’. Both are
different. The happiness of quickly removing the bottleneck changes immediately
into sorrow on seeing new bottlenecks emerging. For example, Professors are
facing problems in imparting higher knowledge to undergraduate students. Especially
in courses which demands knowledge of basic science and mathematics fundamentals.
But unfortunately those fundamentals skills were delivered in speed in school. The
school teachers can’t fail students. Why? Because the bottleneck ‘fail option’ was ‘deleted’ by the
Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD). Result - School system has
simply increased the speed of delivering skills no matter they are fit or not for college education.
Schools deliberately forget that they are connected with college in this ‘value chain of education’. It seems bottleneck
in developing skill is always changing its form in education sector.
Statistics on the government
website (www.forestsclearance.nic.in) tells that 80 projects were submitted after
15th July 2014 and 72 (90%) are already under examination. Another
government website (environmentclearance.nic.in) that 688 projects were
submitted in 2014 alone so far. On a contrasting note, if we look at the data
from 2004 to 2013, on an average 1700 projects sought for environmental
clearances
(EC) every year. But only 534 projects ( 3%) got EC certificate till
4th August 2014. This approval
rate reminds me of an event when we played musical chairs. One of the participants
was the slowest. Others were eventually slowed down as rule doesn’t allow overtaking
the other. Gutsy members in the heat of frustration overtook the bottleneck
member. But they observed that they are still behind that slowest person. They have
to break the rule again and again to be fast. But in the end, they all lost the
game and miraculously the winner was the slowest participant - ‘bottleneck winner’.
Can we say that our
previous Ministry office was like that bottleneck
winner playing with similar strategy. The previous Ministry was crawling
forward at the speed of 3 files /year. And can we say that this new Ministry
office by running at a speed of 65 projects cleared / meeting, is a symbol of minimum governance. The pros and cons
are many for both minimum and maximum governance but we hope that by deleting
the delay button, we don’t manufacture more disasters like that of in
Uttarakhand and Jammu & Kashmir. Demand
for EC certificate is very high by all Industrialists but we should ensure that
the supply of certificates should not transform into orders to Indian army to rescue
during floods.